Within
this article, Margaret Coupe takes 5 examples of recent neologisms and explores
their creation. These neologisms are the initialism ‘BRF’, standing for ‘bitchy
resting face,’ ‘click farm,’ (referring to employment facilities in less
developed countries) ‘phubbing,’ (snubbing out conversation by looking at your
phone) ‘selfie’ (taking pictures of yourself) and ‘zero hours’ (a type of
contract that does not guarantee any work).
Perhaps
most interestingly, in my opinion, is the controversy surrounding the neologism
‘selfie.’ Coupe reflects that ‘the element of self-promotion in producing a
selfie has led one tabloid journalist to dub it ‘the showoffagram.’ This seems
to suggest that the ideology behind a ‘selfie’ may encourage a positive view of
narcissism. The exploration into this noun that has entered the lexicon uses
examples like taking ‘a selfie at Auschwitz,’ to, perhaps, embed a sense of
social commentary throughout the article on what is deemed socially appropriate.
By linking neologisms, like ‘selfie,’ to their position within sociolect, Coupe
is able to look at, and comment upon, attitudes to language or even the negative
connotations of lexis that has recently entered the lexicon.
In the
concluding lines of the essay, Coupe writes ‘new words arise out of a need and
are usually formed from the existing word bank. The word spreads through a
small group at first and then becomes more widely diffused in a kind of ripple
effect. The word may drop out of use or enter the common register and may be
ultimately codified in a dictionary. I hope my survey of a few words is an
indicator of how inventively language can be used, how words enter the language
and how much neologisms tell us about the way we live now.’ This, to me, shows
how language change is not only a study of words, but a study of how language is
used in reference to changing social attitudes and a society’s need for
neologisms to enter the lexicon.
No comments:
Post a Comment